Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 40
United Van Lines, LLC et al v. Seymour et al
as 0:2009cv61738
Plaintiff: United Van Lines, LLC and K & S Moving Systems Inc
Defendant: Stephanie Seymour, Peter Brant and 20th Century Acquisition, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Type: Other Statutes None
Patel v. K & S Enterprises of Sarasota, Inc.
as 8:2009cv02088
Plaintiff: Shankerbhai Patel
Defendant: K & S Enterprises of Sarasota, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Type: Labor Plaintiff
Herbst v. K & S Moving Systems Inc et al
as 0:2008cv61836
Plaintiff: Nathalie Herbst
Defendant: K & S Moving Systems Inc and David Katzenstein
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Plaintiff
S. v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP
as 6:2008cv01226
Plaintiff: K. S. and K. S.
Defendant: Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both
TIN, Inc. v. Voak et al
as 4:2008cv00105
Plaintiff: TIN, Inc. and TIN, Inc.
Defendant: William John Voak and K&S Tank Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02678
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Becker v. Ohio Attorney General et al
as 6:2007cv01417
Petitioner: Jan F. Becker
Respondent: Ohio Attorney General, Marc Dann, J. Petro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oceanconnect.com, Inc. v. M/V CEC Leader We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00244
Plaintiff: Oceanconnect.com, Inc. and Oceanconnect.com, Inc.
Defendant: M/V CEC Leader, M/V CEC Leader and M/V CEC Leader
Claimant: K/S Habro-Kongeaa 2 and K/S Habro-Kongeaa 2
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 741 Shipping
Commercial Metals Company v. M.V. Port Melbourne et al
as 0:2007cv60357
Plaintiff: Commercial Metals Company and Commercial Metals Company
Defendant: M.V. Port Melbourne, Port Melbourne Shipping Co. Ltd., International Tanker Management (Germany) GmbH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty - Damaged/Lost Cargo
Ferrostaal, Inc. v. M/V Aurora Topaz, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2004cv01494
Plaintiff: Ferrostaal, Inc.
Defendant: M/V Aurora Topaz, Aurora Shipping, Inc. , Kritsas Shipping (Panama) S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?