Cases 31 - 40 of 2,146
Holmes et al v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Keiron Kenneth Holmes, Sr., Micky Eugene Hamilton, Jed Allen Taylor and others
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Center, John T. Wilcher, Chatham County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JEFFERSON v. STATE
as 5:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
ORLANDO LAMAR JEFFERSON
Respondent:
STATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Shi-Young Sharper
as 24-10371
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SHI-YOUNG LAMAR SHARPER
Williams v. Chatham County Detention Center
as 4:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lamar Williams
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Aspiro Tires LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Yandi Perez
Defendant:
ASPIRO TIRES LLC and OMAR ASPIRO
Other:
Emmett Lamar Battles
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Christopher Tipton v. Centurion, et al
as 24-10316
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LAMAR TIPTON
Defendant:
CENTURION and UNION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Brinson v. Burnsville Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Lamar Brinson
Defendant:
Burnsville Police Department, Joseph Williamson, Steven Stoler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Demontaye Jones
as 24-10198
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DEMONTAYE LAMAR JONES
GRAHAM v. FORRESTER et al
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
DESMOND LAMAR GRAHAM, JR
Defendant:
KAREN FORRESTER, EMANUAL HERNANDEZ-PEREZ and CENTURION OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
