Cases 31 - 39 of 39
United States of America ex rel. Michelle Smith et al v. Dennis B. Jaffe, D.M.D., P.C. et al
as 1:2013cv01732
Plaintiff:
United States of America ex rel. Michelle Smith, State of Georgia ex rel. Michelle Smith and Michelle Smith
Defendant:
Dennis B. Jaffe, D.M.D., P.C. and Dennis Jaffe
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Justice Allah v. Brian Riordan, et al
as 12-13328
Petitioner - Appellant:
JUSTICE I. ALLAH
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIAN RIORDAN, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Smith v. Dennis B. Jaffe, D.M.D., P. C. et al
as 1:2012cv02010
Plaintiff:
Michelle Smith
Defendant:
Dennis B. Jaffe, D.M.D., P. C. and Dennis B. Jaffee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Allah v. Riordan et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2012cv00191
Plaintiff:
Justice I. Allah
Defendant:
Brian Riordan, State of Alabama, State of New Jersey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Feldkamp v. Walthour et al
as 8:2010cv02735
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Bernard Feldkamp
Defendant:
Keven Walthour, Michelle Smith and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Cellco Partnership
as 1:2010cv20908
Defendant:
Cellco Partnership
Plaintiff:
Michelle Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Homecomings Financial
as 1:2009cv01620
Plaintiff:
Michelle Smith
Defendant:
Homecomings Financial
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Type:
Real Property
Russell et al v. Maesbury Homes, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv00469
Plaintiff:
Stephen Russell, Gillian Russell, Andrew Turner and others
Defendant:
Maesbury Homes, Inc., Paul Oxley, Lindsay Oxley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. American Honda Motor Company, Inc. et al
as 0:2007cv61524
Plaintiff:
Michelle Smith
Defendant:
American Honda Motor Company, Inc. and Michelin North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
