Cases 31 - 40 of 129
HUNTER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 7:2018cv00026
Plaintiff:
ERIC JEROME HUNTER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Daniels v. Schrader et al
as 1:2017cv05104
Plaintiff:
Roy Daniels
Defendant:
Eric Schrader , Envision Property Management Services , James Logan Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
United States of America v. $1,810,490.34 seized from Touchmark National Bank et al
as 1:2017cv04442
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$1,810,490.34 seized from Touchmark National Bank and $1,225,827.11 seized from Bank of America
Claimant:
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
Hines v. FDS Bank et al
as 1:2017cv02704
Plaintiff:
Shawn Hines
Defendant:
FDS Bank and Department Stores National Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Lawson v. Great Plains National Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2017cv00423
Plaintiff:
Malcolm B. Lawson
Defendant:
Great Plains National Bank, N.A., CMG Mortgage Inc. and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryant v. Puhl et al
as 1:2016cv03712
Plaintiff:
Hattie Mae Bryant
Defendant:
Todd Puhl, Pamela Monroe, Mark Richts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Exodus Vision, LLC v. Touchmark National Bank
as 1:2016cv01795
Plaintiff:
Exodus Vision, LLC
Defendant:
Touchmark National Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City National Bank v. McWeeney et al
as 1:2016cv01431
Plaintiff:
City National Bank
Defendant:
Donald McWeeney and Bryan Latham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
