Cases 31 - 40 of 163
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., Automobile Club of Southern California, Darling Ingredients Inc and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company agent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF ESA SOUTH INC v. CH2M HILL CONSTRUCTORS INC ET AL
as 3:2022cv07944
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the use and benefit of ESA SOUTH, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION
Defendant:
CH2M HILL CONSTRUCTORS, INC., a Colorado Corporation, FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv21675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Paul Eknes-Tucker, et al v. Governor of the State of Alabama, et al
as 22-11707
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PAUL A. EKNES-TUCKER, BRIANNA BOE, JAMES ZOE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, FOR CULLMAN COUNTY and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
LAURA BECKER, BILLY BURLEIGH, HELENA KERSCHNER and others
Not Classified By Court:
AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION and ETHICS AND PUBLIC POLICY CENTER
JetBlue Airways Corporation et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
JetBlue Airways Corporation, JetBlue Airways Group Health Insurance Plan, Kraft Heinz Company, The and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly doing business as WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Boe et al v. Marshall et al
as 2:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Eknes-Tucker, Brianna Boe, James Zoe and others
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Daryl D. Bailey and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States of America
Amicus Curiae:
State of Arkansas, State of West Virginia, State of Indiana and others
Petitioner:
Eagle Forum of Alabama and Southeast Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EQUALITY FLORIDA et al v. FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 4:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
EQUALITY FLORIDA, FAMILY EQUALITY, M A and others
Defendant:
RONALD D DESANTIS, FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, THOMAS R GRADY and others
Amicus Curiae:
CHRISTIAN ACTION NETWORK, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NEW JERSEY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Florida et al v. Walensky et al
as 8:2022cv00718
Plaintiff:
STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Defendant:
ROCHELLE P WALENSKY, CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, SHERRI A BERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
