Cases 31 - 40 of 2,723
Parker v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv00665
Petitioner:
Otis Parker
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Calhoun State Prison
as 1:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Parker
Defendant:
Calhoun State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Judd (Polk County)
as 8:2024cv00382
Petitioner:
Gerald Clifton Parker
Respondent:
Grady C. Judd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker et al v. Tricam Industries, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Tate Parker and Tamara Parker
Defendant:
Tricam Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Parker v. Atlanta Capital Assets, LLC
as 1:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Reki Mae Parker
Defendant:
Atlanta Capital Assets, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
Turzak et al v. Royal Caribbean Group et al
as 1:2024cv20343
Plaintiff:
Oliver Turzak and Willa June Parker
Defendant:
Royal Caribbean Group, Resorts World Bimini Bahamas Management doing business as Resorts World Bimini, Genting Americas Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
USA v. Jamiey Parker
as 24-10271
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMIEY TONINO PARKER
Roberts v. Miami Gardens Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv20273
Plaintiff:
Nia Monet Roberts
Defendant:
Miami Gardens Police Department, Kimberly McDonald, Arnold Ingram and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Parker v. State of Florida
as 8:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Gerald Clifton Parker
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
