Cases 31 - 40 of 526
Williams v. Pelzer et al
as 2:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
Donderrious Williams
Defendant:
Jeremy Pelzer, Michael Jones, Steven Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Bond et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Eugene Boyd
Defendant:
Danny Bond and Parker Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 2:2023cv00705
Plaintiff:
Keith W. Brown
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Sean Kennedy, Chad Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109 - Federal Railroad Safety Act
Smith v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 2:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
Matthew Gunnar Smith
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Sean Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109 - Federal Railroad Safety Act
Parker v. Turman et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Austin Parker
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Dekalb County Fort Payne Court Referal et al
as 4:2023cv00471
Plaintiff:
Tommie Jermaine Jones
Defendant:
Dekalb County Fort Payne Court Referal, Doug Parker, Terry Patty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sigers v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Emmett Sigers
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins, Covington County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Landstar Inway, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00397
Plaintiff:
David Parker Anderson
Defendant:
Landstar Inway, Inc. and John Wayne Broderick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Goodwin v. Sanders et al
as 5:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Goodwin
Defendant:
Russ Sanders, District Attorney Jett, Sheriff Max Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
