Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Johnson v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03531
Plaintiff:
Pamela Johnson
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. and Phelan Hallinan Diamond & Jones LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Stephens v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03107
Plaintiff:
Carmen Stephens
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. , Phelan Hallinan & Jones, LLC and Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
BROWN v. LUTTI et al
as 4:2015cv00132
Plaintiff:
HAMILTON BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT LUTTI, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, JEREMY KOBESKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. LUTTI et al
as 7:2015cv00149
Plaintiff:
HAMILTON BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT LUTTI, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, JEREMY KOBESKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. LUTTI et al
as 1:2015cv00130
Plaintiff:
HAMILTON BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT LUTTI, DEPARTMENT OF COURT RECORDS ALLEGEHNEY COUNTY, JEREMY KOBESKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. LUTTI et al
as 3:2015cv00074
Plaintiff:
HAMILTON BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT LUTTI, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, JEREMY KOBESKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Lutti et al
as 1:2015cv22903
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Brown
Defendant:
Robert Lutti, Department of Court Records, Jeremy Kobeski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Lutti et al
as 4:2015cv00139
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Brown
Defendant:
Robert Lutti, Department of Court Records, Allegheny County, Jeremy Kobeski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Brown v. Lutti et al (MAG+)
as 2:2015cv00557
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Brown
Defendant:
Robert Lutti, Allegheny County Department of Court Records, Jeremy Kobeski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Lutti et al
as 6:2015cv01289
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Brown
Defendant:
Robert Lutti, Department of Court Records, Jeremy Kobeski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
