Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Thomas v. The Summerville News et al
as 4:2018cv00171
Plaintiff:
Kevin Max Thomas
Defendant:
The Summerville News, Winston Espy, Gene Espy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilliam v. Summerville Courthouse
as 1:2018mi00076
Defendant:
Summerville Courthouse
Plaintiff:
Larry Gilliam
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
SEASIDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP v. SUMMERVILLE
as 3:2018cv01329
Plaintiff:
SEASIDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP
Defendant:
BERT SUMMERVILLE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Steven Bryant v. Roy Williams, et al
as 18-11291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN DALE BRYANT
Defendant - Appellee:
ROY WILLIAMS, STEVE BATES, UNKNOWN, Chief of the Summerville Police Department and others
Summerville v. State of Alabama et al
as 4:2017cv01457
Plaintiff:
Eric Summerville
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Etowah County Jail, Sheriff of Etowah County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chang et al v. Hobbs et al
as 7:2016cv01752
Plaintiff:
Mario P Chang and Mary K Chang
Defendant:
Ken Hobbs, Calvin Hobbs , Tenn Tom Community Development Incorporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv01956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Summerville v. Ala Dept of Corrections et al
as 4:2014cv02459
Petitioner:
Eric Enman Summerville
Respondent:
Ala Dept of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taj Mahal Auto Group, LLC v. Mahindra & Mahindra, LTD
as 1:2012cv02048
Plaintiff:
Walker Motor Company, Beine Automotive of Southwest Missouri, LLC, Taj Mahal Auto Group, LLC and others
Defendant:
Mahindra & Mahindra, LTD. and Global Vehicles U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Summerville v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 7:2012cv01796
Plaintiff:
Doris Jean Summerville
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
