Cases 41 - 50 of 68
FUNK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv25661
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
VIVIANNE FUNK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FUNK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv02005
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FUNK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv01627
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HURLEY et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03127
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PAYNE, BRANDON GREGORY, STEVEN ATTIG and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Funk v. American Security Insurance Company
as 3:2018cv00263
Plaintiff:
Lorerna Funk
Defendant:
American Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Funk v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2017cv02864
Petitioner:
Jason Funk
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Funk v. American Security Insurance Company
as 3:2017cv01277
Plaintiff:
Lorena Funk
Defendant:
American Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
Bercini v. City of Orlando et al
as 6:2015cv01921
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Bercini
Defendant:
City of Orlando , Amy Columbo , Todd Funke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. et al v. United Potato Growers of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01243
Plaintiff:
Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. and Bi-Lo Holding, LLC
Defendant:
United Potato Growers of America, Inc., United Potato Growers of Idaho, Inc., United II Potato Growers of Idaho, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
STUDY v. MEYER et al
as 3:2014cv00364
Plaintiff:
JOHN STUDY
Defendant:
TODD MEYER, KEN CAMPBELL, MATTHEW KINCAID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
