Cases 41 - 50 of 412
Ballard v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv22359
Plaintiff:
Robert Ballard
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BALLARD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07327
Plaintiff:
JOEY BALLARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Christin Ballard v. Melvin Kesner
as 23-10972
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTIN BALLARD
Defendant / Appellee:
MELVIN KESNER
James Ballard v. State of Florida, et al
as 23-10929
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES LEE BALLARD
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA and ALACHUA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Ballard v. Jones et al
as 5:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Rashad Marquise Ballard
Defendant:
Ms. Jones, Chaplain Flynn, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballard v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv17927
Plaintiff:
Lucinda Ballard
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Arnold et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hugh Arnold, John Matthew Abboud, Frank T Abel and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-10711
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ballard v. Cox et al
as 1:2023cv00991
Petitioner:
Rashad Marquise Ballard
Respondent:
Warden Cox, Jones and Odum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Ballard v. James Colaw
as 23-10662
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES LEE BALLARD
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES COLAW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
