Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Jones v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv20820
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Charles Jone
as 11-13323
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD JONES
Jones v. Unnamed Defendant
as 1:2011cv02341
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Jones
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torrence et al v. Hines et al
as 5:2010cv00328
Plaintiff:
Bessie Torrence, Roshonnee Orr, Charles F Jones, Jr and others
Defendant:
James R Hines, Jr, Jannine Hill, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Food Depot, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00066
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Jones
Defendant:
Food Depot, Inc. and Tracey Hinton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jones v. City of Rome, Georgia Police Department et al
as 4:2008cv00056
Plaintiff:
Charles Winfred Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Rome, Georgia Police Department, Jon Black, Steve Cantrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones et al v. Horace Mann Insurance Company
as 1:2008cv01209
Plaintiff:
Charles O. Jones and Sandra D. Jones
Defendant:
Horace Mann Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Jones v. United States of America
as 1:2008cv00473
Petitioner:
Charles Larry Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones v. USA, et al
as 1:2005cv22622
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Canal Insurance Company v. Dixie Midwest Express et al
as 5:2007cv01339
Plaintiff:
Canal Insurance Company
Defendant:
Dixie Midwest Express, Charles E Jones, Jr and Patricia Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
