Cases 41 - 50 of 640
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv14187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Cleveland v. Londontown, Inc.
as 6:2023cv01154
Plaintiff:
Serena Cleveland
Defendant:
Londontown, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
CLEVELAND v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14676
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CLEVELAND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00767
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont de Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Tamar Thompson, William Spangler, Randall Lynn Spaustat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
CLEVELAND v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09921
Plaintiff:
FELICIANO CLEVELAND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARRELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09778
Plaintiff:
CLEVELAND HARRELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRAY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08807
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BRAY, ROBERT DAVIES, STEVEN ALON FLOWERS HART and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Harpo et al v. Hunter et al
as 1:2023cv01454
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo, T. Mary Brown, Zeric Wideman and others
Defendant:
Robert W. Hunter, III, Carletta Sims-Brown, Vera L. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadnax v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv01341
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Broadnax, Jr.
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Fulton County, Commissioner/Director of the Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
