Cases 41 - 50 of 104
DEAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv17404
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN M DEAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv06585
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DEAS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv05866
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KIM DEAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02485
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
James Barnes, Jr. v. Anthony Spatola, et al
as 19-13585
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES DION BARNES, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SARASOTA POLICE DEPARTMENT, official capacity, ANTHONY T. SPATOLA, DEA Special Agent, official capacity and GARY CORBETT, Sarasota Police Department, official capacity
D'AMICO v. INCH et al
as 4:2019cv00444
Defendant:
MARK INCH, DEAS, JOSEPH EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN F D'AMICO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEAS v. GEOVERA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 4:2019cv00425
Plaintiff:
WILLIE L. DEAS, JR. and WILLIE L DEAS, JR
Defendant:
GEOVERA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
George Pharmacy Inc. v. Barr et al
as 6:2019cv01476
Defendant:
Acting Director, DEA Uttam Dhillon and Attorney General William P. Barr
Plaintiff:
George Pharmacy Inc.
Whiteaker v. Jenning et al
as 5:2019cv01204
Defendant:
DEA, David Smith, Chris Smith and others
Plaintiff:
John Whiteaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Clarke County Schools
as 1:2019cv00272
Defendant:
Clarke County Schools, Clarke County School District, Julia Ann Deas and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
