Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Johnson v. Davenport et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00508
Plaintiff:
Calvin Johnson
Defendant:
Carter F. Davenport, Derrick Carter, Sgt. Jetton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00420
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Stewart
Defendant:
Karla Jones and Derrick Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickman v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00352
Plaintiff:
Edward Philpot Hickman
Defendant:
Karla Jones, Luther Strange, Kim Tobias Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammonds v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00006
Plaintiff:
Mikel Hammonds
Defendant:
Karla Jones, Derrick Carter, Kenneth Sconyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Truss v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00861
Plaintiff:
Quentin Truss
Defendant:
Dominic Jones, Larry Peavy, Nathaniel Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Darbouze et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00215
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
Jean Darbouze , Kay Wilson , Mrs. Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Sconyers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00374
Plaintiff:
Floyd F. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Kenneth Sconyers , Derrick Carter and State of Alabama Department of Corrections
Movant:
Adrian Lee Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQuarley v. Sconyers, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00200
Plaintiff:
Carlos McQuarley
Defendant:
Kenneth Sconyers, Derrick Carter and Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQuarley v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00907
Plaintiff:
Carlos McQuarley
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel and Derrick Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Marengo County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2007cv00461
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Marengo County Sheriff Department, Derrick Carter, Kenneth Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
