Cases 41 - 50 of 105
Leister v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al (Duval County)
as 3:2019cv01020
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Petitioner:
Gary Lee Leister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GIBSON v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03245
Plaintiff:
CECIL GILBERT, DARIUS HART, DEVONTE SHEROD HARRIS and others
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00194
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Department of Revenue v. Gary Woodroffe
as 19-10998
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, on behalf of Lizabeth Lynn Lotsey
Defendant / Appellant:
GARY LEE WOODROFFE
DEEL v. MUCI et al
as 7:2019cv00038
Defendant:
FEC HIGHWAY SERVICES LLC and PETRAQ MUCI
Plaintiff:
GARY LEE DEEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woodroffe v. Coffin et al
as 8:2018cv03023
Defendant:
Ann Coffin, Karen Rushing, Florida Department of Revenue and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Woodroffe
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Woodroffe v. Florida Department of Financial Services et al
as 8:2018cv02872
Defendant:
Marc Stemle, Florida Department of Financial Services, Ann Coffin and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Woodroffe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Department of Revenue v. Woodroffe
as 8:2018cv02621
Plaintiff:
Department of Revenue
Defendant:
Gary L. Woodoroffe and Gary Lee Woodroffe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gary Woodroffe v. JP Morgan Chase, et al
as 18-13197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY LEE WOODROFFE
Defendant - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01809
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
