Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Williams v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00457
Plaintiff:
Keith Williams
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Bayer Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIDDENS et al v. LAWSON et al
as 7:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
RICKY GIDDENS and LYDIA GIDDENS
Defendant:
HUGH LAWSON, W LOUIS SANDS, THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Brian Williams
as 15-12362
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH WILLIAMS
WILLIAMS v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2014cv00051
Petitioner:
KEITH WILLIAMS
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perlman et al v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2014cv80102
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Petitioner:
Robert Perlman , Jeanette Del Socorro Prieb , Johnnie Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv60571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILLIAMS v. USA
as 1:2011cv00039
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
RICHARD KEITH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CLEGG et al v. DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE et al
as 4:2010cv00081
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE, PREMIER BEHAVIORAL SOLUTIONS INC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CLEGG and SHARON ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Williams v. C.E.O. of the Burger King Corporation
as 1:2008cv22754
Plaintiff:
Keith Williams
Defendant:
C.E.O. of the Burger King Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. McCallum Group Enterprises, Inc.
as 8:2007cv02092
Plaintiff:
Keith Williams
Defendant:
McCallum Group Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
