Cases 41 - 50 of 173
Terrell v. Caldwell et al
as 3:2021cv00042
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Terrell
Defendant:
Warden Antonio Caldwell, Medical Mental Health Counselors, Ms. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. AIKENS et al
as 5:2021cv00215
Defendant:
DOCTOR AIKENS, DOCTOR LANE ULRICH and MEDICAL DIRECTOR JENNIFER MASON
Plaintiff:
EDDIE JAMES KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ponton v. Inch et al
as 1:2021cv22363
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Vernon Montoya, Lara Colores and others
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Ponton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plunkett v. Fulton County Sheriff et al
as 1:2021cv01863
Defendant:
Jail Medical Staff Does, Jail Dental Staff Does, Chief Jailer Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Plunkett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Branch v. Calcagno et al
as 6:2021cv00619
Defendant:
C.E. Lane, Executive Medical Director, Manuel Calcagno and others
Plaintiff:
Cassius L. Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deotis Blandburg v. Warden, et al
as 21-11115
Defendant / Appellee:
TERRY BROWN, Lieutenant, AVERY MOODY, Medical Director, CORNELIUS, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEOTIS B. BLANDBURG
SHERMAN v. BURLESON et al
as 3:2021cv00537
Defendant:
JANE DOE, J D HOLLAND, CASTRO and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN DOUGLAS SHERMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larkin Derks, III v. Guzman-Rodriguez, et al
as 21-10785
Defendant / Appellee:
GUZMAN-RODRIGUEZ, BASSA, Medical Director - Outpatient RMC and FIGUEROA, Medical Director
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARKIN LLOYD DERKS, III
LAWRENCE v. KEMP et al
as 5:2021cv00073
Defendant:
MEDICAL DIRECTOR BOWEN, WARDEN LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON, LIEUTENANT KING and others
Plaintiff:
ROOSEVELT LAWRENCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Billy Packer v. Jacques Lamour
as 21-10022
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BILLY PACKER
Defendant / Appellee:
JACQUES LAMOUR, Medical Director
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
