Cases 41 - 50 of 535
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
James McDonough v. Carlos Garcia, et al
as 22-11421
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ERIC MCDONOUGH
Defendant / Appellee:
CARLOS GARCIA, GARLAND WRIGHT, individually and CITY OF HOMESTEAD, a political subdivision of the State of Florida
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Victory Solutions Inc v. United States Department of Veteran Affairs et al
as 5:2022cv00269
Plaintiff:
Victory Solutions Inc
Defendant:
United States Department of Veteran Affairs, Denis McDonough, Center for Verification and Evaluation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MCDONOUGH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv02424
Plaintiff:
CLAYTON MCDONOUGH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
