Cases 41 - 50 of 306
Tuten v. Jones et al
as 4:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
Nash N. Tuten
Defendant:
Shalena C. Jones, Anthony Burtoon, City of Savannah Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eley v. DeSantis et al
as 8:2022cv00851
Defendant:
Christopher Eley, Ron DeSantis, Bob Gualtieri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSBY et al v. PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE et al
as 1:2022cv00040
Plaintiff:
JAMES CROSBY, VIRGLE C KIDD and WILLIAM C PORTER
Defendant:
PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, RYAN CLEVELAND, MAJ A BROCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Lisa et al
as 2:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
Kevin B Gray
Defendant:
Lisa, J Burnum, Public Defenders Office of Shelby County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovingood v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv00208
Petitioner:
Daniel K. Lovingood
Respondent:
Kathleen Smith, Amira Fox, Ashley Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Celotto v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv00201
Petitioner:
Mark S. Celotto
Respondent:
Kathleen Smith, Amira Fox, Ashley Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovingood v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv20957
Plaintiff:
Daniel K. Lovingood
Defendant:
Kathleen Smith, Amira Fox, Ashley Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Barger v. Fox et al
as 2:2022cv00185
Petitioner:
Corey R. Barger
Respondent:
Kathleen Smith, Amira Fox, Ashley Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Celotto v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv20876
Plaintiff:
Mark S. Celotto
Defendant:
Kathleen Smith, Amira Fox, Ashley Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Laycock v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
James B. Laycock
Defendant:
Kathleen Smith, Amira Fox, Ashley Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
