Cases 41 - 50 of 84
Muhammad v. Jones et al
as 3:2018cv00212
Plaintiff:
Akeem Muhammad
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Johnny Frambo, Shane Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Jones et al
as 3:2018cv00089
Plaintiff:
Akeem Muhammad
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Johnny Frambo, Shane Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv01632
Plaintiff:
Lolita R. Davis
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DAVIS v. BRADLEY et al
as 5:2016cv00506
Plaintiff:
BILLY R DAVIS, JR
Defendant:
STEVEN BRADLEY, SHEILA H PERRY, KERI F THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoover et al v. PPG Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03415
Plaintiff:
Greg Hoover , Renee Gravlee , Jan Pankow and others
Defendant:
PPG Industries, Inc. , PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc. and PPG Architectural Coatings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BEAZLEY UNDERWRITING LTD v. GO GREEN BIOPRODUCTS LLC et al
as 5:2016cv00347
Plaintiff:
BEAZLEY UNDERWRITING LTD
Defendant:
GO GREEN BIOPRODUCTS LLC, TMD TECHNOLOGIES GROUP LLC, DANCAR HOLDINGS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
WILDING et al v. DNC SERVICES CORPORATION et al
as 0:2016cv61511
Plaintiff:
WILDING, STEPHEN HOUSEKNECHT, DAVID L MEULI and others
Defendant:
DNC SERVICES CORPORATION and DEBORAH WASSERMAN SCHULTZ
Intervenor:
Steve Schonberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Poborouchouk v. Davis
as 4:2016cv10021
Plaintiff:
Michail F Poborouchouk
Defendant:
Michael R Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roosevelt Thomas, Jr. v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 16-11852
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROOSEVELT THOMAS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON, INC., ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TRACY STRICKLAND and others
Davis v. SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2015cv00862
Petitioner:
Donald R Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
