Cases 41 - 49 of 49
RE/MAX, LLC v. First United Realty, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00323
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
First United Realty, Inc., First United Realty of GA, Inc., Roman Feigin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
David O'Rear v. Greenwich Insurance Company, et al
as 11-10295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID O'REAR, a.k.a. David Chris O'Rear
Defendant - Appellee:
GREENWICH INSURANCE COMPANY and RE/MAX PROPERTIES
Re/Max International, LLC v. Prism Enterprises of Central Florida, Inc. et al
as 6:2010cv01047
Plaintiff:
Re/Max International, LLC
Defendant:
Prism Enterprises of Central Florida, Inc. and Shalendar Moman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
RE/MAX International, Inc. v. CitiMaxx Corporation et al
as 8:2008cv02554
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX International, Inc.
Defendant:
CitiMaxx Corporation and Robert Fernandez
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RE/MAX International, Inc. v. Mini-Max Realty, Inc.
as 1:2008cv03830
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX International, Inc., RE/MAX International, Inc. and RE/MAX International, Inc.
Defendant:
Mini-Max Realty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 a False representation-goods sold-interstate commer
Re/Max International, Inc. v. Dunhill Properties, Inc. et al
as 6:2008cv00892
Plaintiff:
Re/Max International, Inc., Re/Max International, Inc., Re/Max International, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Dunhill Properties, Inc. and Robert D. Winters
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Benjamin v. Steven James Development, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv20894
Plaintiff:
Robert Benjamin and Robert Benjamin
Defendant:
Steven James Development, LLC, Austin James Properties, LLC, Riley, More & More Enterprises, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
McCarley v. City of Roanoke et al (MAG+)
as 3:2007cv00311
Plaintiff:
George D. McCarley
Defendant:
City of Roanoke, Penny Holloway, Ellen Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
