Cases 41 - 50 of 17,342
FLORENCE v. HYLES et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Respondent:
U.S. MAGISTRATE STEPHEN HYLES, Judge CLAY D LAND, Judge BOBBY PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. K Trucking LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02470
Plaintiff:
Onike Smith
Defendant:
K Trucking LLC, Protective Insurance Company and Carlton Mitchelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Moore et al v. ContainerPort Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Willie E.T. Moore and Rebecca S. Moore
Defendant:
ContainerPort Group, Inc. and Clarence Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Wright v. Smith et al.
as 6:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
William Andre Jemel Wright
Defendant:
Officer L. Smith and City of Oviedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Argueta v. Smith State Prison et al
as 6:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Enio Humberto Argueta
Defendant:
Smith State Prison, John Doe (1), John Doe (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv02392
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Smith
Defendant:
Robert Wilson, GNS Trucking Inc., ACE Property and Casualty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Stephenson Smith v. Ted Jackson, et al
as 24-11826
Plaintiff:
STEPHENSON LAMAR SMITH
Defendant:
TED JACKSON, OFFICER JONES and OFFICER WILLIAMS
Argueta v. Smith State Prison et al
as 4:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Enio Humberto Argueta
Defendant:
Smith State Prison, John Doe (1), John Doe (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
