Cases 41 - 50 of 3,468
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Logsdon v. Woods
as 5:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Richard Logsdon
Respondent:
Billie Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Rankins, Woods
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Wendy Williams
Defendant:
Sylvia Rankins, Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Christopher Woods v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10617
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER WOODS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Woods v. Account Resolution Corporation
as 5:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Rotesia Woods
Defendant:
Account Resolution Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Love v. Spring Woods Property Holdings LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Kat Love
Defendant:
Spring Woods Property Holdings LLC and Blue Rock Premier Properties LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Green v. Vitani et al
as 6:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
Alexander Lamar Green
Defendant:
A. Vitani, S. Garcia, L. Walden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. COPELAND et al
as 4:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
LAMAR WOODS
Defendant:
ASHLEE COPELAND, W SUMMERS and MATTHEW J TERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Pritchett et al v. United Parcel Services Inc
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Cain Pritchett, Micheal Arnold, Bradley Barkley and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
