Cases 51 - 60 of 96
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv22633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
NELSON v. PLEAS et al
as 5:2015cv00109
Plaintiff:
JURDIS NELSON
Defendant:
J P PLEAS, GEORGE IVEY and INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Peerless Insurance Company v. J. P. Graham Transport Inc et al
as 5:2015cv00427
Plaintiff:
Peerless Insurance Company
Defendant:
J. P. Graham Transport Inc, Gerald's Mobile Repair, McGriff Tire & Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
J.P. et al v. Connell et al
as 2:2015cv00103
Defendant:
Brian Connell and Boy Scouts of America
Plaintiff:
J. P. and R. P.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1101
Cook v. Brandenburg et al
as 1:2014cv02385
Plaintiff:
David Lamont Cook
Defendant:
J. P. Brandenburg and T. S. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. ALLEN et al
as 7:2014cv00044
Plaintiff:
DAMON YOUNG
Defendant:
MARTY ALLEN, CALVIN ORR, S EMMONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harry Boggs, Jr. v. Shawn Emmons, et al
as 14-10138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRY LEE BOGGS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SHAWN EMMONS and J. P. MILLER, Chaplain
BOGGS v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2013cv00167
Plaintiff:
HARRY LEE BOGGS, JR
Defendant:
SHAWN EMMONS and J. P. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Cunningham v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corpo, et al
as 13-15742
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES D. CUNNINGHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
CHASE MANHATTAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, as Trustee for J P Morgan Chase Acquisition Trust 2007 - HE1 Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates Series 2007 - HE1, MCCALLA RAYMER, LLC and others
Williams v. Union Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2013cv01504
Plaintiff:
Larry Williams
Defendant:
Union Correctional Institution, R. E. Manning, W. L. Cardinal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
