Cases 51 - 60 of 103
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Nelson et al v. Knepp et al
as 1:2017cv01752
Plaintiff:
Trudy Nelson and Gerald Nelson
Defendant:
David Knepp and Beam Bros. Trucking Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GREATER DRIFTWOOD ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC et al v. WALTON COUNTY FLORIDA et al
as 3:2017cv00294
Plaintiff:
GREATER DRIFTWOOD ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC , DORIS BEAM , JAMES HOPSON and others
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY FLORIDA , SARA COMANDER , WILLIAM CHAPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. v. ScanTech Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01080
Plaintiff:
Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Defendant:
ScanTech Holdings, LLC and ScanTech Identification Beam Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
William Johnson v. Feda, et al
as 16-17496
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM RANDY JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
FEDA, PROBATION OFFICER 2, and/or and WENDELL BEAM
Robert Beam v. USA
as 16-16565
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT BEAM
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cepull v. Spalding County et al
as 3:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
Justin Cepull
Defendant:
Spalding County , Spalding County Board of Commissioners , Rita Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cepull v. Spalding County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2016cv00886
Plaintiff:
Justin Cepull
Defendant:
Spalding County Sheriff's Department , Wendell Beam , John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bohannon v. Gibson et al
as 3:2016cv00039
Plaintiff:
Susan Amanda Bohannon
Defendant:
David Gibson, Wendell Beam and Spalding County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
