Cases 51 - 60 of 239
King v. Maliza et al
as 1:2021cv23956
Plaintiff:
Paul King
Defendant:
Amy Maliza, Disanto Law, Justin Kates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. King et al
as 1:2021cv23889
Plaintiff:
Paul King
Defendant:
Michael King, Lauri Kibby, Charles Kieley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. Canaccord Genuity et al
as 1:2021cv23841
Plaintiff:
Paul King
Defendant:
Canaccord Genuity, Graham Saunders, Spiro Kletas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joseph v. Bank of America et al
as 4:2021cv00186
Defendant:
Smith, Ronick & Corbin, LLC also known as Smith, Cavin & Corbin, LLC doing business as Smith, Cavin & Corbin, LLC, Bank of America, Neighborhood Assistance-Corporation of America and others
Plaintiff:
Jasel Joseph
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
IRAHETA v. HOUSTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2021cv00104
Defendant:
SOUTHERN CORRECTIONAL MEDICINE LLC, CITY OF WARNER ROBINS, GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE D IRAHETA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04529
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Giles v. Shri Yamuna Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04489
Defendant:
Gani Mohammed, Shri Yamuna Enterprises, Inc., GSJ Covington, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Spencer Giles
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04454
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cricket Wireless LLC et al v. Noelthetechexperts, LLC et al
as 0:2020cv62165
Plaintiff:
AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T Intellectual Property II, L.P. and Cricket Wireless LLC
Defendant:
Noel Brown, John Does 1-20 and Noelthetechexperts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Taylor v. Service Corporation International et al
as 0:2020cv60709
Defendant:
SCI Direct, Inc., John Does 1-20, S.E. Combined Services of Florida, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Nancy Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
