Cases 51 - 60 of 679
DUKES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv25092
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE DUKES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Duke v. Tennessee Credit Management Inc
as 5:2022cv01529
Plaintiff:
William Duke
Defendant:
Tennessee Credit Management Inc a Tennessee Corporation doing business as TCM Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Natt v. Prison Officials
as 1:2022cv04701
Plaintiff:
LaWayne Natt
Defendant:
Prison Officials, Prison Official Pollard, Prison Official Dukes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
DUKES et al. v. COMPREHENSIVE CONTINGENCY TASK FORCE LLC, et al.
as 4:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
WENDY J DUKES and ALICIA M HINTON
Defendant:
COMPREHENSIVE CONTINGENCY TASK FORCE LLC doing business as CCTF RAPID READY and MICHEL JOHANSEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pytynia v. United States, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv01999
Plaintiff:
Janet-Monica Pytynia
Defendant:
United States, Inc., Duke Energy, Duke Energy Florida, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
CS Energy, LLC v. Doosan Gridtech EPC, LLC, et al
as 8:2022cv02288
Plaintiff:
CS ENERGY, LLC
Defendant:
DOOSAN GRIDTECH EPC, LLC, and DUKE ENERGY BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
USA v. Dwyne Deruise
as 22-12983
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DWYNE BYRON DERUISE, a.k.a. Duke
Xaragua El v. Duke Energy Corporation
as 8:2022cv01998
Plaintiff:
Erod Habib Xaragua El
Defendant:
Duke Energy Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
DUKE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14421
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE DUKE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
