Cases 51 - 60 of 107
Jarrell v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00602
Plaintiff:
Marquise Jarrell
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Easterling Correctional Facility, Walter Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Daniel Cobble v. District Attorney Fred Bright, et al
as 17-11126
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant - Appellee:
FRED BRIGHT, Baldwin County, BILL MASSEY, Baldwin County, KIMBERLY EASTERLING, AUSA and others
Daniel Cobble v. District Attorney Fred Bright, et al
as 17-10563
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent - Appellee:
FRED BRIGHT, District Attorney Baldwin County, BILL MASSEY, SHERIFF Baldwin County, KIMBERLY SANTEBA EASTERLING and others
McDonald v. Easterling Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00670
Plaintiff:
Octavius T. McDonald
Defendant:
Easterling Correctional Facility, Ms. McClure, Nurse Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prude v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00454
Plaintiff:
Franklin Prude
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Walter Myers, Sgt. Borders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry v. Richie et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00291
Plaintiff:
Draper Scott Terry
Defendant:
Warden Richie, Captain Lawson, Mr. Anglin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rickey Crittendon v. Easterling CF Warden, et al
as 16-10740
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICKEY CRITTENDON
Respondent - Appellee:
EASTERLING CF WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Guy v. Neil et al
as 2:2016cv00290
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jon Guy
Defendant:
Neil, Easterling, Hoover Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wendell Hightower v. Easterling CF Warden
as 15-15306
Petitioner - Appellant:
WENDELL HIGHTOWER
Respondent - Appellee:
EASTERLING CF WARDEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
