Cases 51 - 60 of 2,217
Marielena Gomez-Navarro, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 23-13864
Petitioner:
MARIELENA GOMEZ-NAVARRO and JOSE ANIEL GOMEZ-NAVARRO
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Avila-Gomez v. Neely
as 7:2023cv01597
Petitioner:
Brenda Avila-Gomez
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gomez v. Smart Endeavors ABA, LLC
as 2:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
Valentina Gomez
Defendant:
Smart Endeavors ABA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-13763
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gomez-Feliz v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv05224
Petitioner:
Luis Alberto Gomez-Feliz
Respondent:
Warden Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dombroski v. VPGB, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv62054
Plaintiff:
Darin Dombroski
Defendant:
VPGB, Inc. doing business as Poiriers Service Center and Horacio Gomez Beret
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
In re: David Webb
as 23-13544
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID Q. WEBB
Respondent:
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, MIAMI DADE COUNTY MAYOR, MIAMI-DADE COUNTY HOMELESS TRUST and others
Steven James Gomez Jr. v. D. Richardson
as 1:2023cv04892
Plaintiff:
Steven James Gomez Jr.
Defendant:
Officer D. Richardson, Judge Jennifer Neal-Jones, Christopher Kehell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv23971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
