Cases 51 - 60 of 62
Thornton v. Seabolt et al
as 1:2013cv03692
Petitioner:
Georgette Benita Thornton
Respondent:
Kathy Seabolt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thornton v. Benefield et al
as 1:2013cv03206
Plaintiff:
Georgette Benita Thornton
Defendant:
Deborah C. Benefield, Benham and United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Collins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2010cv02762
Plaintiff:
Georgette Petrasy Collins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
QA3 Financial Corp. v. Catlin Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 1:2010cv23452
Plaintiff:
QA3 Financial Corp.
Defendant:
Catlin Specialty Insurance Company, Nohemy Sokolsky, Arthur Cargill and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0635
Georgette Hutchison v. Commissioner of SSA
as 10-10646
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGETTE HUTCHISON
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Ramos et al v. All Purpose Insurance, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv01826
Plaintiff:
Belinda Ramos, Georgette Diaz, Nancy Cortes and others
Defendant:
All Purpose Insurance, Inc., Kayton Scarboro and Sandra Alexander
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Perlman, Esq. v. Delisfort
as 9:2009cv81088
Plaintiff:
Jonathan E. Perlman, Esq., Jonathan E. Perlman, Esq. and Jonathan E. Perlman, Esq.
Defendant:
Georgette Delisfort
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Altemme et al v. C4 Direct Soulutions, LLC et al
as 0:2009cv61097
Plaintiff:
Mirlene Altemme, Katia Joseph and Georgette Alexis
Defendant:
C4 Direct Soulutions, LLC and Ron Thibeau
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hutchison v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2008cv00741
Plaintiff:
Georgette Hutchison
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
