Cases 51 - 60 of 79
US Bank, N.A. v. Rathka et al
as 6:2016cv00715
Plaintiff:
US Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Lisa Rathka, Unknown Spouse of Lisa Rathka, Unknown Tenant 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fletcher v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 1:2015cv23819
Plaintiff:
Deborah Diane Fletcher
Defendant:
Manager, HUD Fair Housing Act
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Peters v. Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv03398
Plaintiff:
Terrie Peters
Defendant:
Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC , BAC Home Loans Servicing LP , Hud-Housing and Urban Development and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Daniel Bitton v. U.S. Attorney General, et al
as 15-13493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL BITTON
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, BARACK OBAMA, U.S. CONGRESS and others
Bitton v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 1:2015cv22318
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bitton
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States, Barrack Obama, U.S. Congress and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murphy v. Secretary of United States Department of HUD (MAG+)
as 2:2015cv00397
Plaintiff:
Rodney Murphy
Defendant:
Secretary of United States Department of HUD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Secretary of United States Department of HUD et al (MAG+)
as 2:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
Rodney J. Murphy
Defendant:
Secretary of United States Department of HUD, Elizabeth Padgett and State of Alabama
Movant:
Christie L. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Murphy v. United States Department of HUD
as 1:2015cv00206
Plaintiff:
Rodney Murphy
Defendant:
United States Department of HUD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
