Cases 51 - 60 of 1,164
Hart v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Polk County)
as 8:2023cv02748
Petitioner:
Randy A. Hart
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Auburndale Police Department, City of Auburndale and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Minor v. Whitehead et al
as 3:2023cv01568
Plaintiff:
Jerry Minor
Defendant:
Devin Whitehead, Nicholas Roach and Christopher Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Randy Hart v. Polk County Sheriff's Office
as 8:2023cv02605
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen Hart
Defendant:
Polk County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randy Hart v. Polk County Sheriff's Office
as 1:2023cv24306
Plaintiff:
Randy A Hart
Defendant:
Polk County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 8:2023cv02525
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc, Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Laurel K. Hart
Not Classified By Court:
John Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Zachary Carey v. Harvey Wasserman, et al
as 23-13658
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZACHARY OLEN CAREY
Defendant / Appellee:
HARVEY WASSERMAN, BENNIE HARPER and HART COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
HART v. DAVIS
as 3:2023cv24653
Plaintiff:
RANDY A HART
Defendant:
S DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUCHHEIT v. SIMMONS et al
as 3:2023cv24642
Plaintiff:
CARRIE BUCHHEIT
Defendant:
CHIP SIMMONS, RAYMOND HART and DEQWAUN WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hart v. Judd
as 8:2023cv02297
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen Hart
Defendant:
Grady Judd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HART v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv32975
Plaintiff:
BEN HART
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
