Cases 51 - 60 of 361
Brito v. Vera Bradley Designs, Inc.
as 8:2022cv02700
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Brito
Defendant:
Vera Bradley Designs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
VERA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv23329
Plaintiff:
GREGORIO JOSE VERA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ALPS Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Sharon Edenfield, et al
as 22-13433
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALPS PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant / Appellee:
VERA SHARON EDENFIELD, EDENFIELD LAW, LLC, EDENFILED & COX, P.C., doing business as Edenfield Cox & Bruce and others
Vera v. USP Atlanta
as 3:2022cv00137
Petitioner:
Luis Vera
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone and Warden USP Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Berger v. Walker et al
as 3:2022cv01033
Plaintiff:
Jackie Berger
Defendant:
CJ Walker, Sgt. J. Stokes and Dr. F. Cruz-Vera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kilduff v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03584
Plaintiff:
Vera Kilduff
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VERA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13861
Plaintiff:
ERICK MITCHELL VERA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VERA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11951
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE MARIE VERA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Kelvin Vera
as 22-12450
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KELVIN VERA, a.k.a. Kevin Vera
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
