Cases 61 - 70 of 4,179
Williams v. T-Mobile, USA
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
T-Mobile, USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swint v. Williams et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Darryl Swint
Defendant:
Karen Williams and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Mitchell v. HUD and Prichard Housing Authority
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
William J. Mitchell
Defendant:
HUD and Prichard Housing Authority
Williams et al v. Piccadilly Restaurants, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Barbara Williams and Gladys Yvonne Smith
Defendant:
Piccadilly Restaurants, LLC, Piccadilly Holdings, LLC, Danny Grubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Hammer et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00461
Defendant:
3M Company, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Hammer, James Barnes, J Kim Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Woodbrook Apartments
as 2:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Camillia Williams
Defendant:
Woodbrook Apartments
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
May v. Metro PCS et al
as 1:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Jamie Christopher May
Defendant:
Metro PCS, AT&T Corp, Google Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
