Cases 61 - 70 of 126
Cobb County-Marietta Water Authority v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 1:2017cv00400
Plaintiff:
Cobb County-Marietta Water Authority
Defendant:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Robert M. Speer, Jo-Ellen Darcy and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
USA v. Darcy Piloto
as 17-10184
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DARCY PILOTO
McCoy v. Clermont Lounge, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00002
Plaintiff:
Darcy McCoy
Defendant:
Clermont Lounge, Inc. and Catherine Martin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
FOSTER-BEY v. HILL et al
as 3:2016cv00629
Plaintiff:
KEVIN FOSTER-BEY
Defendant:
RON HILL, JACK SMITH, JERRIMY CARROLL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson County Board of Edu v. Bryan M, et al
as 16-16882
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, an agency of the State of Alabama
Defendant - Appellee:
BRYAN M and DARCY M, individually and as parents, guardians, next friends and legal representatives of R.M., a minor
Darcy Piloto v. USA
as 16-16250
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARCY PILOTO
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Waterkeeper et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 0:2016cv61975
Plaintiff:
Miami Waterkeeper , Center for Biological Diversity , Florida Wildlife Federation and others
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers , Jo-Ellen Darcy , Todd T. Semonite and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 0181
Branch v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
as 8:2016cv01764
Plaintiff:
Darcy Branch
Defendant:
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
In re: Darcy Piloto
as 16-13330
Petitioner:
In re: DARCY PILOTO
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
D'Onofrio et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC.
as 8:2016cv00925
Plaintiff:
Darci D'Onofrio and Bryan D'Onofrio
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
