Cases 61 - 70 of 89
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Julien v. Williams et al
as 8:2010cv02358
Plaintiff:
Marie Julien
Defendant:
David L. Williams and Hertz Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Type:
Other Statutes
Hertz Corporation et al v. Hertz Auto Transport Inc et al
as 1:2009cv23476
Plaintiff:
Hertz Corporation, Hertz System, Inc and Hertz Equipment Rental Corporation
Defendant:
Hertz Auto Transport Inc and Gary Nixon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Pizarro v. Woods et al
as 1:2009cv01991
Plaintiff:
Benito Pizarro
Defendant:
Fernaldo L. Woods, Jr., Fernaldo L. Woods, Jr., The Hertz Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Type:
Torts - Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Disability Act of 1990
Nasco v. The Hertz Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv20889
Plaintiff:
Monica Nasco
Defendant:
The Hertz Corporation, The Hertz Corporation, The Hertz Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.