Cases 61 - 70 of 124
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00106
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Peacock v. Jackson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00151
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Peacock
Defendant:
James Jackson, Thomas Kincey, Traves Yelder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Zimmer et al v. Dometic Corporation
as 1:2018cv20746
Defendant:
Dometic Corporation
Plaintiff:
James Zimmer, Randall Ortego, Kurt Shoemaker, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON v. HOLLIS
as 5:2018cv00020
Plaintiff:
CURTIS JAMES JACKSON
Defendant:
QUINTON HOLLIS, H GUY GREEN and JEANIE HOOPPELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jeffery Jackson v. Mark Cieutat, et al
as 17-15406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFERY JAMES JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK ALAN CIEUTAT and GUY NAQUIN
Jackson v. Cieutat et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00560
Plaintiff:
Jeffery James Jackson
Defendant:
Mark Alan Cieutat and Guy Naquin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARSWELL v. CONLEY et al
as 5:2017cv00203
Plaintiff:
JAMES JACKSON CARSWELL
Defendant:
T J CONLEY, DONALD BARROW, MICHAEL ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Carswell v. Michael Rogers, et al
as 17-11799
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES JACKSON CARSWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL ROGERS, DOCTOR, Washington State Prison, jointly and severally, individual and official capacity, DWAYNE AYERS, DR. Calhoun State Prison, Jointly and severally, individual and offical capacity, WILLIAM MCCLARIN, JR., DOCTOR Ware State Prison, Jointly and severally, individual and official capacity and others
Reid v. Crickmar et al
as 1:2017cv00230
Plaintiff:
Travion Reid
Defendant:
Scott Crickmar, Randy Reed, Patti Sneed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2016cv00273
Petitioner:
CURTIS JAMES JACKSON
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
