Cases 61 - 70 of 5,161
Daniel Le Clerc, Sr. v. John Guy, et al
as 24-11047
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ALLEN LE CLERC, SR.
Defendant:
JOHN I. GUY and MARK R. MILLER
HALE v. HALE et al
as 4:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
RODRICK HALE
Defendant:
RENEE HALE, TERRENCE HALE, TERRY MITHELL, SR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Anderson, Sr. v. Telfair SP Warden
as 24-11034
Petitioner:
JAMES E. ANDERSON, SR.
Respondent:
TELFAIR SP WARDEN
Gehefer v. Brady Transportation, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Glenn Gehefer, Sr.
Defendant:
Brady Transportation, LLC and Jeffrey Ray Willhoite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle
MUJICA v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
KERVIN MORENO MUJICA, SR
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and LAURA ANNE ROSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grochowski, Sr. v. American Protection Plans LLC et al
as 9:2024cv80379
Plaintiff:
Alan Grochowski, Sr.
Defendant:
American Protection Plans LLC doing business as American Residential Warranty and WHAT IF DIRECT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Evans et al v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
as 8:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
Ava Evans and Chris Evans, Sr.
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
USA v. Troy Williams, Sr.
as 24-10953
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TROY WILLIAMS, SR.
WRIGHT v. LEO
as 3:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
LAVETTE M WRIGHT
Defendant:
MAXIE WILLIAM LEO, SR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. ITSA Solutions, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Rashawn Allen
Defendant:
ITSA Solutions, LLC d/b/a Barnacle, a New Jersey limited liability company, Colin Heffron, Sr., Colin Heffron, Jr. and others
Other:
Jeffrey Carter Andersen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
