Cases 61 - 70 of 515
WHITAKER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13500
Plaintiff:
JASON RICHARD WHITAKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Haley v. Walmart Supercenter et al
as 2:2022cv01017
Plaintiff:
LaSonia Haley
Defendant:
Walmart Supercenter, Sams Club, Broadmoore Gardens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITAKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09574
Plaintiff:
COREY WHITAKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-12007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Whitaker v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
as 6:2022cv00966
Plaintiff:
Allison Whitaker
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Rains v. Coleman et al
as 5:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Devonte Rains
Defendant:
Warden Brian Coleman, Deputy Warden Roy Odum, Deputy Warden Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennamer v. Marshall County, Alabama et al
as 4:2022cv00642
Plaintiff:
Joel Kennamer
Defendant:
Marshall County, Alabama and Whitaker Contracting Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rains v. Coleman et al
as 4:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Devonte Rains
Defendant:
Brian Coleman, Roy Odum, Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rains v. Coleman et al
as 5:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Devonte Rains
Defendant:
Warden Brian Coleman, Deputy Warden Roy Odum, Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rains v. Coleman et al
as 4:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Devonte Rains
Defendant:
Warden Brian Coleman, Roy Odum, Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
