Cases 71 - 80 of 5,330
Wooden v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Camp
as 5:2024cv00020
Petitioner:
James Wooden
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Anderson v. Warden, USP Coleman 2
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Denny Ray Anderson
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PARHAM v. COLEMAN et al
as 5:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
MANDRELL PARHAM
Defendant:
CHARLES COLEMAN and CESAR SISKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
INGMIRE v. ROBINSON
as 3:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
CHARLES D INGMIRE, II
Respondent:
COLEMAN L ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rincon-Puello v. Warden - FCC Coleman Low
as 8:2024cv00598
Petitioner:
Juan Rincon-Puello
Respondent:
Warden - FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pickens v. Morgan et al
as 2:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Travis Sentel Pickens
Defendant:
Ms. Morgan, Mr. Smith, Mr. Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Steen v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Marion Michael O'Steen
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Marmol Vallejo v. Warden, FCC Coleman Low
as 8:2024cv00594
Petitioner:
Fredy Donaldo Marmol Vallejo
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Marmol Vallejo v. Warden, FCC Coleman Low
as 5:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Fredy Donaldo Marmol Vallejo
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
