Cases 71 - 80 of 160
Forte v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01096
Plaintiff:
Ashleigh Forte
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc. , Corizon, LLC , Butch Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tate v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00272
Plaintiff:
Ricky David Tate
Defendant:
Corizon Health Inc. and Butch Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corizon Health, Inc. v. Faulks
as 4:2017cv00012
Plaintiff:
Corizon Health, Inc.
Defendant:
Carl Faulks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richardson v. Corizon Health, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00228
Plaintiff:
Christine Richardson
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Curry v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv14017
Petitioner:
David T. Curry
Respondent:
Corizon Health, Inc., George Jorge, M.D., Misty Gaddis, ARNP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv14008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TIERNEY v. JONES et al
as 4:2017cv00005
Plaintiff:
RYAN TIERNEY
Defendant:
JULIE L JONES , CORIZON HEALTH INC and CORIZON LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Nelson v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 17-10057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON NELSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORIZON HEALTH INC., UNKNOWN NAMED MEDICAL PRACTIONERS, CORIZON HEALTH INC EMPLOYEE OR AGENT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Danielle Garcia v. Charles Li, et al
as 16-17460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIELLE GARCIA
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES LI, of Georgia Regional Hospital in his Official and individual capacity, R.L. (BUTCH) CONWAY, Gwinnett County Sheriff, in his official and individual capacity, KATHRYN M. SCHRADER, in her official and individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
