Cases 71 - 80 of 424
DOMINGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16574
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DOMINGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DOMINGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15375
Plaintiff:
RICARDO DOMINGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hall v. Santiago et al
as 1:2022cv22105
Plaintiff:
Kristian J. Hall
Defendant:
Edward Santiago, Dana Robin Goldman, Daniel Junior and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv22047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dominguez v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 8:2022cv01005
Plaintiff:
Sandra Dominguez
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
GARCIA v. AAM Insurance Corp et al
as 1:2022cv21317
Plaintiff:
YOSDALIS E. GARCIA
Defendant:
AAM Insurance Corp doing business as UNIVISTA INSURANCE, Alberto Dominguez Menendez and Alain Dominguez Menendez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv20537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Garcia v. Jackson Health System et al
as 1:2022cv20465
Plaintiff:
Julio Juan Garcia
Defendant:
Jackson Health System, MDCR- Health Services, Metro-Dade 030-Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv20254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
