Cases 71 - 80 of 130
THORN v. WEBER SPORTS LLC
as 3:2019cv03509
Defendant:
Weber Sports LLC
Plaintiff:
Robin Thorn
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Burt v. Doe et al
as 2:2019cv14347
Defendant:
Warden John Doe, Officer/Sergeant Jane Doe, T.A Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Burt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Young v. USA, et al
as 19-11768
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES R. YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Solicitor General of the United States, S BETANCOURT, A.S.O.E., FNU THORNE, SIS Investigation Officer and others
THORNE v. NELSON et al
as 4:2019cv00119
Defendant:
EMILY NELSON and TIMOTHY NELSON
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER THORNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franklin County Commission v. Madden et al
as 3:2019cv00230
Plaintiff:
Franklin County Commission
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, Lafayette Insurance Company, Sinclair Lawrence & Associates Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Young v. United States of America et al
as 5:2018cv00509
Defendant:
A Gannon, The United States of America, John / Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
James R. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thorne v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv04353
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC and Jimmy Hard
Plaintiff:
Mara Thorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
THORN v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv01865
Defendant:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY THORN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Rodriguez v. The Wellness Habitat Company, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv22570
Plaintiff:
Cailliam Rodriguez
Defendant:
The Wellness Habitat Company, LLC and Robert Thorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
