Cases 81 - 90 of 3,644
Tiffany Wingo, et al v. Branson Harris, et al
as 24-10933
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY WINGO, KIEARA WINGO, ERIKA WINGO and others
Defendant:
BRANSON HARRIS, CHARLES GORDON, PAUL WILKERSON and others
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
RODRIGUEZ v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR
Defendant:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY, Warden SHAWN EMMONS, Warden BRIAN ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leon Bright v. City of Tampa, et al
as 24-10812
Plaintiff:
LEON BRIGHT
Defendant:
CITY OF TAMPA, J. LAMBERT, CHRISTINA M. MITCHELL and others
Young v. Park at 500, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01043
Plaintiff:
Keith Young
Defendant:
Park at 500, LLC and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Lavorado et al
as 6:2024cv00531
Petitioner:
James Jonathan Mitchell
Respondent:
M Lavorado, Daiquiri Duncan, Lopez and others
Defendant:
Sgt. M Lavorado, Warden Daiquiri Duncan, Sgt. Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez v. American Airlines, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv20997
Plaintiff:
Roberto Chavez
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc. and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Carruth v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv01294
Petitioner:
Terrence Carruth
Respondent:
John or Jane Doe and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson-Bey v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Haneef Shakeel Jackson-Bey
Defendant:
FNU Smith and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Deandre Arnold v. Hillsborough County Sheriff, et al
as 24-10634
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE ARNOLD
Defendant:
CHAD CHRONISTER, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SHERIFF, ADRIEL GONZALES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
