Cases 81 - 90 of 651
Mitchell-Ware et al v. Bryant-Groover et al
as 8:2022cv02487
Defendant:
Angelina Colonneso, Shirley Bryant-Groover, Mark Barnebey and others
Plaintiff:
Christel Ware-Martin
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
WARE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22100
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MARCUS WARE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ware-Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2022cv02486
Plaintiff:
Christel Ware-Martin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DENICK v. WARE STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
ANTONY RAMON DENICK and Anthony Ramon Penick
Defendant:
WARE STATE PRISON, WARDEN JOHN DOES, Mr. Thift and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENICK v. WARE STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2022cv00372
Plaintiff:
ANTONY RAMON DENICK and ANTHONY RAMON PENICK
Defendant:
WARE STATE PRISON and WARDEN JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Willie Ware
as 22-13448
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIE KEITH WARE
WHITE v. HUDGINS et al
as 5:2022cv00207
Petitioner:
SAUNDRA L. WHITE and SAUNDRA L WHITE
Respondent:
HUDGINS, P. ADAMS, LORI SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ware v. GARLAND et al
as 9:2022cv81366
Plaintiff:
Robert Ware
Defendant:
General MERRICK GARLAND and Bruce Reinhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WARE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16730
Plaintiff:
LEAH WARE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WARES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14665
Plaintiff:
SCOTT DENNIS WARES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
