Cases 81 - 90 of 551
Travel Syndication Technology, LLC v. Does 1-5
as 1:2021cv03894
Plaintiff:
Travel Syndication Technology, LLC
Defendant:
John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Colon v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2021cv00149
Plaintiff:
Valencia Colon
Defendant:
Richard Roundtree, Hardie Davis, William Fennoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN et al v. JACKSON et al
as 1:2021cv00168
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANTWOHN GREEN and TYRESS DONTAE MATHIS
Defendant:
OFFICER LATAEVIA S JACKSON, OFFICER THOMAS J MOORE and JOHN DOES (1-5)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shadix et al v. Yum! Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03638
Plaintiff:
Wanda Shadix and Sherrel Shadix
Defendant:
Yum! Brands, Inc., Taco Bell of America, LLC and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Arrington v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (Delaware) et al
as 1:2021cv03322
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Arrington
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (Delaware) and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
CHARR v. KING et al
as 1:2021cv22903
Plaintiff:
MAHMOUD CHARR
Defendant:
DON KING, DON KING PRODUCTIONS, INC., EPIC SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charr v. King et al
as 0:2021cv61654
Plaintiff:
MAHMOUD CHARR
Defendant:
DON KING, DON KING PRODUCTIONS, INC., EPIC SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
CHARR v. DON et al
as 1:2021cv22891
Plaintiff:
MAHMOUD CHARR
Defendant:
KING DON, Don King Productions, Inc., EPIC SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FORD et al v. INCH et al
as 3:2021cv00932
Plaintiff:
JAMES TERRELL FORD and BOBBY GENE GRAHAM
Defendant:
MARK INCH, JIMMY COKER, SGT. STEPHENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD et al v. INCH et al
as 3:2021cv00931
Plaintiff:
JAMES TERRELL FORD and BOBBY GENE GRAHAM
Defendant:
MARK INCH, JIMMY COKER, SGT. STEPHENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
