Cases 81 - 90 of 6,515
MILLER v. ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD.
as 1:2024cv20311
Plaintiff:
ANNE MILLER
Defendant:
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES, LTD. doing business as ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Tillery v. Frank et al
as 8:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Tillery
Defendant:
Trudy Frank, Michelle Miller, Zackary Frank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, et al
as 24-10254
Plaintiff:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant:
JOHN T FOWLKES, DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS and others
v. Altai Systems, Inc. et al
as 9:2024cv80071
Defendant:
Altai Systems, Inc. and Angela Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Miller v. Altai Systems, Inc.
as 9:2024cv80072
Plaintiff:
Angela Miller
Defendant:
Altai Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor
Le Clerc v. Guy et al
as 3:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Daniel Allen Le Clerc, Sr.
Defendant:
John I. Guy and Mark R. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lorenzo v. 2200 Restaurant Partners, LLC
as 0:2024cv60078
Plaintiff:
Julian Lorenzo and William Miller
Defendant:
2200 Restaurant Partners, LLC doing business as Dune by Laurent Tourondel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Nepton v. Ramirez-Juarez et al
as 0:2024cv60064
Plaintiff:
Javier Isaac Nepton
Defendant:
Angie Ramirez-Juarez, Jonathan Miller and Fort Lauderdale City Commission and its Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MADISON v. BERRY et al
as 5:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MADISON
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, MR CLARK, MR GARDENER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
