Cases 81 - 90 of 3,651
In re: Henry Smith
as 23-13920
Petitioner:
In re: HENRY CLAY SMITH
Respondent:
DONALD MCMILLIAN, MARY B. WINDOM and STATE OF ALABAMA
Silas MartinIn re: Silas Martin
as 23-13867
Petitioner:
In re: SILAS MARTIN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Erramraju v. Lamar et al
as 2:2023cv01272
Petitioner:
Ramaraju Rom Erramraju
Respondent:
David Lamar and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
May v. Talladega County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv01477
Plaintiff:
Jamie Christopher May
Defendant:
Talladega County Jail, State of Alabama, Julie Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Mays et al
as 4:2023cv01478
Plaintiff:
Michael J Mays
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Herman Harris, Kenneth Parham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Standfield v. Headley et al
as 3:2023cv01319
Petitioner:
Timothy Bryan Standfield
Respondent:
Asst Warden Joesph Headley and Attorney General State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Headley et al
as 5:2023cv01251
Petitioner:
Undral Sandor Davis
Respondent:
Headley and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carden v. Howell et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Shane Eugene Carden
Defendant:
Michael Howell and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
State of Alabama v. Pugh
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama
Defendant:
Jason Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Removal of Civil/Criminal Action from State Court
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
