Cases 1 - 10 of 42,652
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Elinski v. Hyundai ENG of America, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00119
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moore v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2024cv01081
Plaintiff:
John Moore, III
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and Franklin Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coxwell v. Nu-Old Restaurant Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02549
Plaintiff:
John Coxwell
Defendant:
Nu-Old Restaurant Group, Inc., A Delaware Corporation, Uncle Jacks Meat Company of Peachtree Corners, LLC and others
Walton v. Merrett et al
as 3:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Angela M. Walton
Defendant:
John Merrett, Diidre Wells, Trudeau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Johnson v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00291
Petitioner:
John Henry Johnson
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SMITH v. DECATUR COUNTY PRISON et al
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
HAROLD UNYULA SMITH, SR
Defendant:
DECATUR COUNTY PRISON, WARDEN GORDON SCREEN, JR and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fantel v. Department Homeland Security et al
as 3:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
C. John Fantel
Defendant:
Department Homeland Security, State of Rhode Island, Boston Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Norfleet v. Riggs et al
as 8:2024cv01407
Plaintiff:
Tino A. Norfleet
Defendant:
E. Riggs, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
